DISQUS

Linda · 9 months ago

Uh, your challenge sounds... radical. Might scare the bean-counters. And besides, I thought that was what small presses were for: to publish literature that takes risks. No, to just publish literature. Am I wrong here? Peace, Linda

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . scaring bean counters sounds like a lot of fun! . . .

Richard Nash · 9 months ago

The irony is that there's money to be made, doing what you propose.

josie · 9 months ago

Beans are soooo last century. I agree with you J-man, time to step it up a notch and break from the mold. The big houses that do this will set the direction and pace for the field as we come out of this slump. The ones who take up your challenge will reap great rewards . . . and so will the readers!

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . ricardo should know, since he just led soft skull to their best year ever--in the worst possible climate! . . . harper collins should offer him his own imprint . . .


. . . agreed on all counts, josie!

harold hollingsworth · 9 months ago

now I envision a stage dive right into the suits, and wanting it to be a variable of a punk show at the Key Arena. I'd love to see it in other words!

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . i hope you're there to catch me, double-h!

Dennis O'Reilly · 9 months ago

Can't wait to read your first review.

aaaaaaron · 9 months ago

I look forward to a literature rebellion. Web 2.0 is dismantling the old school hold on what writing is literature, and what literature gets distributed. The publishers that are taking risks are the ones that deserve to survive.

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . yes, i'll be interested to see if any of the big houses send us something dangerous!


. . . and aaron, i agree, the risk-takers are the ones who will survive!

James P. Othmer · 9 months ago

After you save publishing, I'd like you to move on to music, newspapers, micro-breweries and baseball. Not necessarily in that order.

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . .ha! well, knowing me, jimbo, i think you can guess the order!

Tammy Allen · 9 months ago

I'm not much of a publishing expert so I'll say let's save beer.


Congrats on your Westcoast blogging POV.



BUNNIES

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . yes, beer-- i'm already saving it (when i'm not drinking my stores) . . .

Drinks with Tony · 9 months ago

there's been so much ...dreary... and a sense of doom in the publishing world b/c big houses are laying off and everyone's worried.


i like your challenge. there has been too much safety...too much 'what if i offend _____?' ...too much six and seven figure advances to intense mediocrity.



as writers we have to keep up with what's going on in the publishing industry...and it's also our responsibility to redefine it.



then again, health insurance is good to have and my teeth are rotting out of my head.

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . traditionally, it seems to me that the writer was the once informing the zeitgeist and determining what was of social relevance . . .somewhere along the line the marketing folks took over . . . and don't get me wrong, i have a lot of respect for good marketers . . .but they strike me as 'how' people more than 'what' people . . . btw, congrats on the book offer, tony!

Zohar · 9 months ago

I like your challenge! I wrote a book that is a mix of poetry, prose and nonfiction with a strong story line.


I have had the honor of meeting many editors who all tell me the same thing without even reading the script: a book that you can not place on one shelf, (two max,) at Barnes and Nobles will not get published... sad case of oligarchy, a small number of companies own everything in the world: from books to laundry detergent.

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . . hmmm, seems to me that moby dick had a number of narrative elements (poetry, essay, fiction)-- and that one's probably in a few b&n's!

Zohar · 9 months ago

That was Moby Dick in Moby Dick's time. You heard of the casablanca project? The script Casablanca submitted now gets rejected left and right... it is actually really funny. or about Jane Austen's work getting rejected or the booker prize winners of the 70's resubmitting now, and their sordid tale ;)


http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/4651/



http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Casablanca_Rejected/



http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/publishers_reject_booker_prize_winners/



Regardless, I hope you are right and the information I received is wrong. Optimism, perseverance and talent are everything in writing.

Jonathan Evison · 9 months ago

. . .yes, i remember hearing how the great gatsby was rejected twenty-odd times, once by the publisher who was already slated to publish it . . .one editor is purported to have told fitz something along lines of: get rid of that gatsby character, and you might have something . . . also heard about the grapes of wrath being submitted to a bunch of houses some years back and getting universally rejected . . .my question: how the fuck did any of those editors not recognize the grapes of wrath? i mean, even if you hadn't read it, at some point aren't you going: hmmm, dustbowl, okies, joad family, why does this sound so familiar?